Monday, November 4, 2013

The Law and You






· R. v. Titchner (1961, Ont. CA):  speeding in a car, attempts to pass and loses control


  Sets out a test for criminal negligence, to be convicted the jury must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused acted either (based on the notion of liability in tort):


(1)   with the deliberate intention of doing or omitting to do something which it was his duty to do, the consequences of which he should have known would endanger the safety of others


(2)   had such disregard for the lives and safety of others as would indicate that he was heedless of what the consequences of his conduct might be.
 Note From Ken Cressey

I can understand a one time event, an error in judgment but not continuous and prolonged . There was a full understanding of the concerns and all ignored prior to any work done on the site. 
 References
Letter To the Ministry of Natural Resources
Letter to Council North Frontenac
Affidavit
Court Transcript
Letter From Ministry of the Environment   http://deathanddustmystory.blogspot.ca/2011/07/page-6.html
Jeanine's Journal
Falsified Compliance Reports 



An example of how the Law or Acts are applied to workers who hold Trade Licences. How an individual who sees his Dues marked up by 300%. Not a choice a demand by this institution. But the main point is the Law and Acts no longer represent the people but rather the interests of the Government. We no longer have a system that is based on fairness and accessibility but one of cost and greed. 

don't pay my due as stated I am subject to the fines and costs.  Interesting that you can harm people cause pain and suffering to people, ignore the acts and regulations  but as a stakeholder you get "no you shouldn't do that". We no longer have a fair and just Society but one solely based on greed and intimidation. 




No comments:

Post a Comment